Archive for the ‘movies’ Category

Scares so good

Pray for Rosemary's baby.

For as long as I’ve loved movies, I’ve hated horror. What was there to like? It’s a genre of cheap tricks, manipulating the cinematic space to produce scares and generally throwing plot and character development to the wind in favor of blood, gore and one absurd murder after another. But like all generalizations, mine has proven it’s not quite a perfect fit. The most popular horror films almost always appeal to the worst in us — slasher flicks were all the rages for years, with franchises like Friday the 13th, Halloween, and Nightmare on Elm Street persisting year after year. More recently, so-called torture porn like Saw, Hostel, and The Hills Have Eyes has pushed the glorification of gore and violence to its limits, doing its best to scare the audience with a grisly sensory overload. And that’s not the horror worth paying attention to.

Tonight I watched Rosemary’s Baby, a deeply disturbing film perfectly crafted by Roman Polanski. There are no cheap scares produced by actors suddenly jumping into frame; there are no rivers of blood, eviscerated corpses or immortal murderers. There’s just the story of a young woman entangled in a surreal web of the occult, not comprehending or believing the terror of her situation until it’s far too late. Perfect pacing creates a taught, constantly unsettling film that grows more and more eerie as it goes. Polanski drops enough hints, employs just enough subtle music, to gradually increase the suspense to the bursting point. That’s what great horror is about — withholding information as long as possible, unnerving the audience and ultimately facing them with something relentless, impossible to overcome, something that strikes at the soul rather than the body.

Aside from the suspenseful filmmaking itself, Polanski accomplished this in Rosemary’s Baby by tapping into a primal instinct and subverting it — the innocence of a child. It’s because they should be so innocent that the reverse becomes so horrifying. It’s been used to great effect in classics like Village of the Damned and The Omen. Of course, plenty of not-so-great films try to employ the same concept — The Good Son, for example — but even then, the psychological angle still works better than any Jason or Freddy movie.

Where each film starring the terror of Camp Crystal Lake relishes in showing every kill, the most suspenseful horror films draw out the scene and subvert your expectations. The Hitcher might seem like it has more in common with slashers than Hitchcock, but it’s another example of a horror movie that triumphs by attacking the minds of its characters, rather than impaling them on a fishhook or giving them the old meat cleaver; it’s relentless insanity, presented against a serene and beautiful backdrop that makes Rutger Hauer’s chilling hitchhiker a scarier incarnation of evil than Freddy or Michael Myers.

Remakes of classic or cult classic horror films almost unanimously lack some quality of their forbearers; the new Hitcher passes up the grit and mental intensity of the original for more glamorous violence. Maybe it’s just the current trend, a newfound bloodlust in the wake of torture porn’s popularity. At least there are still movies every so often that are more about building tension than shocking the audience. Sunshine was a noble and entertaining effort in the sci-fi realm, though it was certainly no Alien. Maybe it’s time I got around to seeing The Descent…or maybe I’ll just explore the depths of Hitchcock, instead.

GameSpite: FFVII Advent Children: completely unremarkable director’s cut edition

Poor Final Fantasy VII. If you hadn’t been so wildly popular, such a spectacularly successful smash hit for Sony’s fledgling disc-based console, perhaps you would have remained a happy memory. But that’s not how things worked out. When you sell more than 10 million copies and introduce a new generation of gamers to the role-playing genre, it’s hard to be bound by the realm of nostalgia. It makes me wonder who’s more to blame for the Compilation of Final Fantasy VII nonsense — Square Enix, eager to whore out their most popular characters for all the money they can grab, or the fans, who eagerly lap it up and still clamor for that PS3 remake.

The whole thing really began with Final Fantasy VII: Advent Children. Now, just three years after the release of the original movie, Advent Children Complete is out, resplendent in 1080p and jammed with 25 minutes of extra footage. Supposedly it’s not the end of the line for the Compilation, but it’s all we’ve got for the foreseeable future.

Read the rest of this entry on GameSpite »

Based on Books: Watchmen Right and Wrong

Despite the inevitable dissent among Watchmen fans, moviegoers, and critics, one thing is fairly certain: Zack Snyder did not butcher, destroy, or otherwise mangle the source material in his effort to convert the most respected graphic novel of all time into something acceptably Hollywood. Camera shots, lines of dialogue, and important plot elements were plucked wholesale from Alan Moore’s creation. The harsh, bleak atmosphere of a Commie-fearing America remained completely intact; the vast majority of the novel was represented faithfully on screen, and a mammoth extended edition will integrate even more material that couldn’t make the theatrical cut.

Of course, complaints remain, opinions will forever be mixed, and Watchmen certainly provides its share of disappointing elements for all its successes. Read on to find out what worked and what didn’t in the cinematic world of Watchmen.

What Watchmen Does Right

Rorschach – Outside of the film noir, voice-over narration rarely really works, and far too often it feels like a contrived or lazy way to quickly convey important plot information. Watchmen is a wonderful exception.

Rorschach (Jackie Earle Haley) delivers his dry, gravelly account of New York’s descent into sin impeccably, dropping unnecessary articles to produce that trademark jarring, blunt assessment of the world. Haley’s portrayal of Rorschach brings the full brunt of the character’s cynicism and brutality to bear in a way I didn’t think would be possible for the film, reaffirming Rorschach’s place in the ranks of the all-time greatest characters in comic book history. And man, that mask — the constantly-shifting inkblot is simply mesmerizing in a way the comic couldn’t hope to match.

Nite Owl – In the graphic novel, Dan Dreiberg hardly seems like a once-upon-a-time superhero — he’s overweight, middle-aged, and more than a little awkward. On screen, he fares a little better — as portrayed by Patrick Wilson he’s younger, more vibrant, and not quite so heavy. The change to his character actually reflects a noticeable shift towards youth and vitality in Snyder’s Watchmen, and I’ll admit that something about his character is lost in the change.

In the end, though, dropping the paunch and a few weary middle-age years works for the character. Enough of the washed-up average joe remains in Wilson’s performance, and he delivers both a solid Dreiberg, bespectacled and tweeded out, and a kickass Nite Owl in a sleek, deadly costume, which makes for far more entertaining cinema than Moore’s out of shape hero.

Dr. Manhattan – I can’t pinpoint exactly why, but there’s just something about Billy Crudup’s soft-spoken delivery that enhances the appeal of any powerful character he portrays. Maybe it’s that dichotomy between Dr. Manhattan’s infinite, deadly abilities and his delicate, oh-so human voice. But Crudup’s performance alone doesn’t bring Dr. Manhattan to life — it’s the incredible special effects that truly transform him. That consistent blue glow that bathes the other actors in an eerie light and those milky-white eyes make Crudup’s character a dead-on match for Moore’s creation.

The Comedian – Edward Blake’s death in the first moments of Watchmen kicks off the story, sending Rorschach on an investigation that eventually leads to the unearthing of Ozymandias’ plot. Despite being dead for the entirety of the story, The Comedian regularly shows up in flashbacks, and it gradually becomes apparent that he is the lynchpin to the complex situation. As the film clues us in on the events Blake took part in over the decades that make up Watchmen’s backstory, it also peels away layers of his character, and Jeffrey Dean Morgan absolutely becomes The Comedian — smirking, malicious, bloodthirsty and cynical. He represents the spirit of Watchmen to the core, a depressing depiction of humanity who sees the worst in people — and in himself — and basks in the debauchery until it consumes him.

Tone – Alan Moore’s Watchmen remains consistently serious over its 12 chapters, telling an intricate tale with realistic characters and a plot more structured and deliberately, delicately paced than nearly any other comic book ever written. Even Rorschach’s joke about Pagliacci the clown reflects the graphic novel’s bitter sentimentality, turning comic relief into a means of showing how utterly hopeless life truly is. And while Snyder’s adaptation retains the adult plot and impending doom of nuclear Holocaust, the tone is noticeably different.

Ironically, the film version of Watchmen feels more like a comic book than its paper-and-ink counterpart, a change that undoubtedly irks the majority of Moore purists, to say nothing of the author himself. Pop music, a caricatured Nixon and raucous action scenes all populate the movie. And for the most part, they make it a considerably more enjoyable experience. By taking itself just a little less seriously than the original work, Watchmen manages to turn incredibly difficult source material into something entertaining and watchable, while leaving the adult narrative more or less intact.

Music – Watchmen’s soundtrack is as awesome as it is unexpected. The marginally less serious, comic book feel of the film allows for music that connects key scenes with a relevant piece of pop culture or simply fits the vibe of the moment. Bob Dylan and Simon and Garfunkel are the last things that come to mind alongside a comic like Watchmen, but they add emotion and energy to scenes in a way that printed material, quite obviously, cannot. A more traditional, solely orchestral score would’ve been playing it safe, but the pop songs show a unique awareness of the historic periods the film moves through. And that part when Archie bursts through the Antarctic ice and carves a groove into the snow in time with the wailing guitar of All Along the Watchtower? Oh yeah.

Slow motion – Given that Snyder’s previous film, 300, was built upon a foundation of gratuitous slow-motion, I expected to see a repeat performance in Watchmen. The trailers painted a grim picture, but Snyder toned it down for the full feature, and by and large the slow motion remains in its appropriate place, improving the action scenes instead of slowing them to a ridiculous crawl. Each fight scene feels appropriately kickass, balancing Snyder’s trademark style with a welcome healthy dose of moderation.

What Watchmen Does Wrong

Ozymandias – He’s the smartest man in the world. The fastest man in the world. His grand, evil scheme is really a genius plot to save humanity. Unfortunately, Snyder’s Watchmen cuts Adrian Veidt’s screen time down to his essential scenes and crams his backstory into a portion of the film that robs it of its effectiveness. Matthew Goode simply can’t carry the character, and his portrayal of Ozymandias invokes none of the elegance, eloquence, or human appeal it should. And the dramatic revelation of his guilt hardly delivers the gut-punch of surprise it should — how could it, when Goode comes across as cold and arrogant and his black costume practically screams menace?

Silk Spectre II – Like Nite Owl, Silk Spectre II sheds a few years for the film adaptation of Watchmen, and Malin Akerman looks mighty fine in that black-and-yellow latex. Too bad that’s just about all she does. While there’s still enough left to Dan Dreiberg after his Hollywood makeover to retain an appealing character, Laurie Jupiter is stripped of all the little flaws that make her interesting. She no longer smokes; she’s no longer depressed or temperamental; she looks just as young and vibrant in the film’s present as she does in its flashbacks. And without those flaws, Laurie becomes the shallowest member of the main cast. I’m not sure if the majority of the blame lies with the script or Malin Akerman’s performance, but the end result is a flat, weak character.

Rorschach and the psychiatrist – We’ve already established that Rorschach exudes awesome in almost lethal doses, and the film adaptation brings him to life perfectly. That said, I was disappointed to see his time with Dr. Malcolm Long cut short; in the original story, Malcolm plays an important role in Chapter VI, and Rorschach’s blunt cynicism gradually breaks down the psychiatrist’s cheery optimism. We see the world through Malcolm’s eyes, and his own transformation at the figurative hands of Walter Kovacs’ psyche exposes us to the full brunt of Moore’s bleak depiction of human existence. It’s Rorschach’s finest moment, and would likely be the first scene I’d choose to have added to an extended adaptation.

Minor inconsistencies – When dealing with such a complex story and the time constraints of a film conversion, some things aren’t going to work out quite perfectly. A few remnants of the story remained intact when they really shouldn’t have, resulting in weaker scenes lacking the thought-out precision of Moore’s work. In the graphic novel, The Comedian discovers Veidt’s master plan accidentally while investigating the island housing the faux-alien giant squid. But in the film, there’s no such justification for his unearthing of Ozymandias’ intentions. Veidt’s giant lynx, Bubastis, was meant to be a holdover of his genetic experimentations in that same project, but that plot thread is entirely absent from the film, leaving the animal’s existence unexplained.

Rorschach’s confrontation with Moloch also suffers from the conversion, as much of their interaction is cut from the film. In the comic, Rorschach tells the retired villain to drop a note requesting a second meeting, should he remember any useful information. With that sequence of events missing, Rorschach’s convenient arrival at Moloch’s apartment, just in time for Veidt’s trap, makes little sense. And the office of the New Frontiersman newspaper only shows up in the film’s final moments, which makes Rorschach’s decision to give them his journal some 20 minutes earlier especially vague.

Nudity – The nudity in Watchmen is a tricky subject. On the one hand, the film deserves considerable respect for not flinching from male nudity and staying absolutely true to Dr. Manhattan’s comic book depiction. On the other hand, the significance of his nudity as a symbolic detachment from everyday society isn’t referenced, and I’m not sure anyone really wanted or needed to see quite that much blue wang. Even the sex scenes between Laurie and Dan appear goofy and poorly handled.

While artist David Gibbons drew plenty of scenes with nude characters, the inherent difference in detail between a comic book and a live-action movie shifts the focus considerably. When there are naked people on screen, it’s hard, if not impossible, to pay attention to something else, and the film simply couldn’t convey the same degree of subtlety as Gibbons’ art. That not-quite-so-subtle tone worked for nearly everything in Snyder’s Watchmen, but not so for the nudity.

Based on Books: Jaws

From the moment John Williams’ iconic score strikes its first ominous chord, no one would ever think of water in the same way again. The spectacular success of “Jaws” extends beyond the silver screen in a way few films can boast to match — not only did it launch the concept of the summer blockbuster, it penetrated the public conscience so completely that beach attendance in the summer of 1975 took a noticeable hit.

John Williams’ inventive use of minimalism, which was an integral part of the movie’s success, gave birth to a new style of suspense music that quickly became synonymous with impending doom. The same concept of minimalism pervades the entire production, making the shark’s appearance on-screen all the more terrifying when it finally happens.

Read the rest of this entry on Based on Books »

Based on Books: Akira

“Akira.”
It’s one of those names that sticks with you.  Strong, mysterious, foreboding.  What does it mean?   Who is Akira?
Perhaps the name’s indelible quality actually results from the film itself, because “Akira” is one of those films you’ll never forget—even if you’re not entirely sure who or what Akira is by the end of its two hours.
“Akira” set a high bar in 1988 as an audio-visual powerhouse, propelled by a massive budget topping $10 million.  The meticulously detailed animation has endured for 20 years and can stand to-to-toe with the best produced even today.  Every scene bustles with activity.  Every background captures the grimy, worn-down feel of a post-war cyberpunk Tokyo, a city wallowing in its own filth and corruption.  And the movement, often a sticking point for Japanese animation, attains a Disney-esque level of fluidity.  When huge crowds riot in the streets, entire swaths of the landscape explode into rubble and dust, and biker gangs hurtle through the city, it’s obvious that budget was worth every cent.
Even throwing down a cool $11 million couldn’t truly tap into the full scope of Katsuhiro Otomo’s saga; despite the overuse of the term “epic” in the post-Lord of the Rings era, “Akira” personifies the term.  Otomo’s original manga, a 2000+ page landmark of graphic fiction, tells a vast, complex tale impossible   to contain on film.  Thankfully, his illustrative prowess makes the transition.  Kaneda’s red biker jacket and sleek motorcycle are transcendent; they will, quite probably, be cool forever.  The bikes and their wicked neon light trails remain one of the film’s most enduring images, despite their relatively small amount of screen time.
And then there’s the antagonist Tetsuo, who begins life as a kid with self-confidence issues and a mean streak and ends things as a maniacal, super powered psychic.  His character makes the jump to celluloid, but his story arc can’t quite do the same.  “Akira’s” expansive, convoluted narrative simply can’t be accurately stuffed into a two hour film, and the end result is a bit of a mess—major characters are cut completely, disparate pieces of the story are cobbled together, and only a tiny fraction of the entire saga gets its due representation.  Even the film’s namesake, the poster child for creepy Japanese children, hardly gets any screen time!  Akira is the ultimate result of psychic-powered government experimentation; he actually becomes a major part of the graphic novel’s plot, which feels far more appropriate than his brief, phoenix-like resurrection from bottles of preserved organs in the film’s final minutes.
Considering Otomo’s involvement with the animated production—and the fact that his manga didn’t end until two years after the movie’s release—it’s more appropriate to view “Akira” as an alternate version of the story rather than an attempted translation from one medium to the other.  A far-too-brief, not-so-coherent plot replaces the manga’s endless series of action scenes and long arcs of character development.
Even so, the film is carried on the strength of its superb animation and bizarre, stunning soundtrack.  And it was the animated version of “Akira” that helped ignite an appetite for anime in the United States, which is likely why it’s still recognized in the realm of pop culture to this day.  But maybe it’s not all about the cool motorcycles, wowza explosions and entertaining psychic powers.  When you get down to it, “Akira” is a pretty dark film—it begins with Armageddon, and it’s hard to say whether the city born from Tokyo’s ashes, a wretched hive of scum and villainy, really deserves to be saved at all.  On the flip side, Kaneda’s youthful determination doggedly propels a strong thematic undertone that the human spirit is worth fighting for—all you have to do is believe in yourself.
With a two-part live-action version of “Akira” in the works and slated for 2011, we may get to see just what it is that makes the story so captivating.  Maybe those badass bikes really are all you need…or maybe it really was just the name all this time.

Akira.

It’s one of those names that sticks with you.  Strong, mysterious, foreboding.  What does it mean?   Who is Akira?

Perhaps the name’s indelible quality actually results from the film itself, because Akira is one of those films you’ll never forget — even if you’re not entirely sure who or what Akira is by the end of its two hours.

Akira set a high bar in 1988 as an audio-visual powerhouse, propelled by a massive budget topping $10 million.  The meticulously detailed animation has endured for 20 years and can stand to-to-toe with the best produced even today.  Every scene bustles with activity.  Every background captures the grimy, worn-down feel of a post-war cyberpunk Tokyo, a city wallowing in its own filth and corruption.  And the movement, often a sticking point for Japanese animation, attains a Disney-esque level of fluidity.  When huge crowds riot in the streets, entire swaths of the landscape explode into rubble and dust, and biker gangs hurtle through the city, it’s obvious that budget was worth every cent.

Even throwing down a cool $11 million couldn’t truly tap into the full scope of Katsuhiro Otomo’s saga; despite the overuse of the term “epic” in the post-Lord of the Rings era, Akira personifies the term.  Otomo’s original manga, a 2000+ page landmark of graphic fiction, tells a vast, complex tale impossible   to contain on film.  Thankfully, his illustrative prowess makes the transition.  Kaneda’s red biker jacket and sleek motorcycle are transcendent; they will, quite probably, be cool forever.  The bikes and their wicked neon light trails remain one of the film’s most enduring images, despite their relatively small amount of screen time.

And then there’s the antagonist Tetsuo, who begins life as a kid with self-confidence issues and a mean streak and ends things as a maniacal, super powered psychic.  His character makes the jump to celluloid, but his story arc can’t quite do the same.  Akira’s expansive, convoluted narrative simply can’t be accurately stuffed into a two hour film, and the end result is a bit of a mess — major characters are cut completely, disparate pieces of the story are cobbled together, and only a tiny fraction of the entire saga gets its due representation.  Even the film’s namesake, the poster child for creepy Japanese children, hardly gets any screen time!  Akira is the ultimate result of psychic-powered government experimentation; he actually becomes a major part of the graphic novel’s plot, which feels far more appropriate than his brief, phoenix-like resurrection from bottles of preserved organs in the film’s final minutes.

Considering Otomo’s involvement with the animated production — and the fact that his manga didn’t end until two years after the movie’s release — it’s more appropriate to view Akira as an alternate version of the story rather than an attempted translation from one medium to the other.  A far-too-brief, not-so-coherent plot replaces the manga’s endless series of action scenes and long arcs of character development.

Even so, the film is carried on the strength of its superb animation and bizarre, stunning soundtrack.  And it was the animated version of “Akira” that helped ignite an appetite for anime in the United States, which is likely why it’s still recognized in the realm of pop culture to this day.  But maybe it’s not all about the cool motorcycles, wowza explosions and entertaining psychic powers.  When you get down to it, Akira is a pretty dark film — it begins with Armageddon, and it’s hard to say whether the city born from Tokyo’s ashes, a wretched hive of scum and villainy, really deserves to be saved at all.  On the flip side, Kaneda’s youthful determination doggedly propels a strong thematic undertone that the human spirit is worth fighting for — all you have to do is believe in yourself.

With a two-part live-action version of Akira in the works and slated for 2011, we may get to see just what it is that makes the story so captivating.  Maybe those badass bikes really are all you need…or maybe it really was just the name all this time.

Based on Books: Slaughterhouse-Five

Kurt Vonnegut’s famous novel Slaughterhouse-Five, which chronicles the unusual life of Billy Pilgrim, bounces back and forth between farcical satire and a sobering, anti-war depiction of World War II and the 1945 bombing of Dresden. Unfortunately, the 1972 film adaptation is light on the farce, and the end result is a movie that gives us a little too much Billy Pilgrim and not quite enough of Vonnegut’s irreverent, quirky humor.

Billy has a strange problem — he has become unstuck in time. As a result, he floats freely from one moment of his existence to another, never knowing which part of his life he’ll be living next. In a completely unrelated (but equally bizarre) incident, Billy is abducted by the fourth-dimension-dwelling Tralfamadorians, who view time as a series of moments that occur simultaneously. Every moment simply exists — there’s no then or now, no past or future.

Billy’s time-jumping lays a perfect narrative foundation for the film to build on, resulting in a story that hops, skips and jumps between the important happenings in Billy’s life. The focus remains on Billy’s time as a soldier in World War II, which is the key moment in his life that the rest of the story builds around. Vonnegut’s goofy cast of characters show up, and creepy Paul Lazzaro and poor old Edgar Derby both get even more attention in the film than they receive in the novel.

The attention both characters get — the added dialogue, extra screen time — and their interactions with Billy highlight Slaughterhouse-Five’s biggest problem. The novel isn’t about Paul Lazzaro, or Edgar Derby, or even so much about Billy Pilgrim. Or, rather, the fact that Billy is the protagonist isn’t what makes Slaughterhouse-Five great — the appeal of the book comes from Vonnegut’s fantastic narrative, which relies far more on descriptive passages and amusing tangents and anecdotes than dialogue or character interaction.

Without Vonnegut’s authorial voice guiding the quick jumps between moments of Billy’s life, we don’t see him as the bemused, aloof character he is — a man who never seems to really care too much about anything. Except, perhaps, the philosophical teachings of Tralfamadore. And the omission of Kilgore Trout, a character whose wacky science-fiction novels seem to be Vonnegut’s way of poking fun at himself, leaves the film lacking just one more of the elements that make Slaughterhouse-Five such a quirky, insightful work of literature.

Even so, the quality of Vonnegut’s novel shines through on screen in spots. The inherent humor in the series of events that make up Billy’s war experiences is sometimes even better portrayed on film — his conversation with the leader of the British POWs is especially hilarious. Some of Vonnegut’s themes also make their way into the film — Billy’s wife Valencia does her best to stand for the absurdity of consumerism, and the tragedy of war comes across just as strongly as it does in the book.
As the film approaches its conclusion, the grim scenery of post-bombing Dresden evokes a stronger reaction than any moment leading up to that inevitable finale. Edgar Derby’s almost casual execution by firing squad, his punishment for taking a useless figurine in the aftermath of Dresden’s destruction, perfectly communicates the utter senselessness of war and its rules and guidelines.

But, in the words of Kurt Vonnegut: so it goes.

Mobile Suit Gundam: Through the Sea of Stars

I pray, pray, pray to bring near the New Day.The Mobile Suit Gundam movie trilogy is, I think, the Japanese equivalent of Star Wars.  The analogy works on all sorts of levels — Gundam is a set of three movies; Star Wars is a set of three movies (the original series, anyway).  Each advanced the genre of sci-fi thematically and visually — Star Wars affected an entire generation of moviegoers, and the iconic design of the RX-78 Gundam can still be seen echoed in anime to this day.  Both trilogies were spawned in the closing years of the 1970s, although the film version of the 0079 saga saw release in the period of time between Empire Strikes Back and Return of the Jedi’s run in theaters.  Finally, both managed to tell a story that is epic in scope and yet deeply personal, balancing the fate of billions with the struggles of a select few.  Ultimately, this is what makes them timeless.

Tracing Gundam’s history will, unsurprisingly, bring up another similarity to the Star Wars saga.  The fact that the latter trilogy ended up becoming a key piece of cinematic history was fairly miraculous, considering the myriad production problems it faced and the sheer inventiveness required for its groundbreaking special effects.  Gundam’s road to existence was, perhaps, longer and rockier — the original series, broadcast on television in 1979, didn’t exactly set the ratings board on fire.  It was canceled 9 episodes short of its intended 52-episode run.  But that wasn’t the end.  Thanks to the success of Gundam models in 1980, interest picked up, and the series was reconstructed for a theatrical run.  The second and third entries in the series, entitled Soldiers of Sorrow and Encounters in Space, contained a significant amount of newly-animated footage.  The end result is a trilogy that is even more sobering, serious, poignant, and focused than its television counterpart.  Though its mecha combat may always be Gundam’s lasting legacy, it is the characters and their message that will endure.  From within its disturbingly cold depiction of war as a senseless, hellish slaughter, the desperately hopeful ideal of Newtypes emerges as a powerful, novel concept.

Read the rest of this entry »

I can’t stop loving you

Metropolis is a true work of art inspired by and dedicated to Osamu Tezuka, who was instrumental in the formation and development of both anime and manga over the past half century. Though it was completed several years after his death, Metropolis is, in essence, the culmination of Tezuka’s lifetime of work: it builds on elements from his original Metropolis manga but significantly alters the plot to mirror Fritz Lang’s film, and addresses a swath of issues that show up across the body of his creations. Strife appears within the rigid caste system, within family, and between people and their mechanical creations.  Can the spirit of love conquer all? And, ultimately: what does it mean to be human?

The vast urban sprawl of Metropolis is meticulously and beautifully animated, and the characters are pure Tezuka: simplistic and exaggerated, instantly distinct, and especially expressive for their cartoony manifestation. The most impressive scenes bustle with traditional animation and hundreds of characters. The computer-generated imagery hasn’t aged as well, but by and large it blends well enough into the picture. The music is also a delight, and the jazzy soundtrack perfectly meshes with the film’s art deco style that is simultaneously futuristic and old-fashioned.

As an homage, Metropolis is an incredible feat. But as a movie, if Metropolis has any real failing, it’s that the film simply tries to do too much. Atlas’ struggle to overthrow the upper class becomes little more than a bridge between Kenichi and Tima’s time on the run and their capture by Duke Red, and Tima’s turn to Armageddon and subsequent redemption feels rushed and confused in the film’s final moments. The plot isn’t my favorite, but Metropolis is one of the few films in which I feel like plot is a secondary concern to the spirit of the adventure, as Kenichi and Tima’s blossoming friendship is just a tiny part of a vast world that’s realized in a manner rarely matched in cinema.

And even if the wealth of characters were to be stripped away — even if the soul of the movie, realized in so many wonderful characters who each give us a tiny glimpse into some aspect of humanity, be it greed, nobility, sorrow or love — even then, I’d still love Metropolis for finding that sublime union of the visual and the aural. As the Ziggurat falls, bringing an end to the greatness and prestige of Metropolis, it is not the sound of a deafening explosion we hear. It’s not the crash of debris, the buckling of steel, or the breaking of glass.

It’s the blues. A little bit happy, full of soul and tinged with sadness, Ray Charles brings an intimate quality to Metropolis‘ final moments that’s simply, purely human.  For that, it is unmatched.

3 Things I Learned From Predator 2

1. LA Sucked in 1997

Los Angeles, circa 1997: not the nicest place to live.

One of cinema’s oldest, most hilarious practices is to set a movie a few years in the future and predict that just a little ways down the road everything will, inexplicably, go all to hell. I still remember the beginning of Conquest of the Planet of the Apes, in which a foreboding narration informs us that the year is 1991, and cats and dogs are totally extinct.

Predator 2, set a mere 7 years into the future at the time of its release, portrays Los Angeles as a warzone: desperate cops have firefights in the streets against gangs and drug lords. I guess we’ve cleaned the place up a bit in the past decade, huh?  And by we, I actually mean Danny Glover.

Don't try this at home, kids.

What can I say. The man can drive. He’s also good at massacring drug dealers, but that’s just not as original or cool, really.

It just gets better from here. Read the rest of this entry »

Deliver me unto evil

I watched Deliverance last night.

I saw the beginning of the film years ago, and its status as a part of popular culture makes it hard for anyone not to know about the infamous rape scene.  But there’s much more to the film than that.

Deliverance isn’t really a movie you watch.  It’s a movie you experience.  That may sound a little cheesy, but it speaks to the heart of the film itself.  What begins as a weekend canoe trip anyone could relate to quickly becomes a descent into a frightening world that feels completely real, but the mind balks at its existence.  The dichotomy between society and the wilderness is terrifying — as close as they are to civilization,  they are far, far away. Read the rest of this entry »